Epstein Secrets

64 From: Darren Indyke Subject: Fwd: Link a Rockenbach Revised June Bill Date: July18. 2018 PM To: Richard Kahn Cc: Darren Indyke Ok to pay. DARREN K. INDYKE DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor New York New York 10022 email: tit** Fitt fire The information contained in this communi

ly by return e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - O 2018 Darren K. lndyke, PLLC — All rights reserved. Begin forwarded message: From: "Paul V. DeVito" < Subject: Link & Rockenbach Revised June Bill Date: July 18,

401 1 of 1 received EFTA00799164 From: Darren Indyke Subject: Fwd: Link a Rockenbach Revised June Bil

2541126401 1 of 1 received EFTA00799164 From: Darren Indyke Subject: Fwd: Link a Rockenbach Revised J

ecum of J. Epstein and Motion for Protective Order 06/20/18 RJG Review Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces 0.90 355.50 Tecum of J. Epstein (State Court) and hearing transcript on B. Edwards' Motion to Permit Limited Deposition of J. Epstein in preparation for drafting Objections to Notice 06/20/1

LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LIP 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 April 06, 2009 Darren K. Indyke, Esq. 301 East 66th Street, Ste. 10B New York, NY 10085 INVOICE Matter ID: 2008-029 Client ID: 3371 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice # 29675 Federal

WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 April 06, 2009 Darren K. Indyke, Esq. 301 East 66th Street, Ste. 10B Ne

M BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 April 06, 2009 Darren K. Indyke, Esq. 301 East 66th Street, Ste. 10B New York,

WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 April 06, 2009 Darren K. Indyke, Esq. 301 East 66th Street, Ste. 10B New

ss Hearing on Jane Doe 0.90 hr $270.00 03/26/2009 BM Pull and copy Exhibits to attach to State Court Motions to Stay; fax Motions to counsel in State Court cases; scan and pdf Motion to Stay in Jane Doe case; file 3.25 hr $406.25 Motion electronically with Clerk; e-mail from Clerk; print docketed atta

g? A I don't recall. Q Where did Mr. Indyke get the documents that he delivered to you? A I don't know. Q How do you know that the documents Darren Indyke delivered to you were documents that originated on the disc? A Outside of -- I have no independent knowledge. Q So that's information you recei

ifically handed you those documents? A Darren Indyke. Q Where were you? A I believe in New York. I can't be certain. Q How many pages did Mr. Indyke hand you on that occasion? A Less than 100. Q Were those pages accompanied by any cover letter? A Not that I recall. Q Were they accompanie

te from my attorneys, I don't remember anybody else. Q Which lawyers did you communicate with about the content of the documents? A Scott Link, Darren, Jack. Q Anyone else? A Not that I recall. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793452 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6482 Filed 10

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

that disc distributed? Rockenbach: Same objection. Do not answer. Q. *** Did you provide any hard copies of documents derived from that disc to Darren Indyke? Rockenbach: Objection. Exceeds the scope of Judge Ray's order. Attorney-client privilege. Work product protection. (Link 31:23-33:5.) This line

es of documents derived from that disc to Darren Indyke? Rockenbach: Objection. Exceeds the scope of Jud

rd copies of documents derived from that disc to Darren Indyke? Rockenbach: Objection. Exceeds the scope

ese show cause proceedings were instituted shortly thereafter. A privilege determination has never been made and that issue is currently before the State Court. The only issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey E

ned to. Epstein had corporation attorney, Darren Indyke, register the businesses and register himself as

s assigned to. Epstein had corporation attorney, Darren Indyke, register the businesses and register hims

computer check revealed 457 Madison Ave is a business address in which Epstein has his corporations assigned to. Epstein had corporation attorney, Darren Indyke, register the businesses and register himself as an agent. I also observed Epstein has his El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York Strategy Group, Ghi

papers have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 18, 2008. All papers filed in State Court are attached to this Removal Petition. 3. There is unanimity among the defendants. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) the undersigned are auth

computer check revealed 457 Madison Ave is a business address in which Epstein has his corporations assigned to. Epstein had corporation attorney, Darren Indyke, register the businesses and register himself as an agent. I also observed Epstein has his El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York Strategy Group, Ghi

ned to. Epstein had corporation attorney, Darren Indyke, register the businesses and register himself as

s assigned to. Epstein had corporation attorney, Darren Indyke, register the businesses and register hims

papers have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 18, 2008. All papers filed in State Court are attached to this Removal Petition. 3. There is unanimity among the defendants. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) the undersigned are auth

der on J. Epstein's deposition to incorporate D. Indyke's suggested edits; follow up with client and cou

ecum of J. Epstein and Motion for Protective Order 06/20/18 RJG Review Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces 0.90 355.50 Tecum of J. Epstein (State Court) and hearing transcript on B. Edwards' Motion to Permit Limited Deposition of J. Epstein in preparation for drafting Objections to Notice 06/20/1