Epstein Secrets

t's Reply In Support Of Motion In Limine To Exclude In Toto Certain Depositions Designated By Plaintiff For Use At Trial via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell Meredith Schultz 383 S. University Street BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake it UT 4112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste.

Use At Trial via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell Meredith Schultz 383 S. Univer

essions, the Motion in Limine to exclude the use of the designated portions of these depositions in toto must be granted. B. As a Retained Expert, Phillip Esplin Cannot Be Deemed Unavailable Plaintiff's argument concerning Phillip Esplin fails to acknowledge or even address the cases cited that require that

.m. 10 Before: 11 HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, 12 District Judge 13 APPEARANCES 14 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. 16 MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. 17 S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff 18 BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. 19 HA

arrowness 5 of our motion here. We seek to preclude evidence involving 6 that litigation. Your Honor has already heard from my 7 colleague, Ms. McCawley, who has presented our argument for why 8 Dershowitz should not be in this case at all, and of course, if 9 we prevail on point 1, this point bec

H3V0GIU1 1 these other things that are circulating about her that have 2 nothing to do with Ms. Maxwell. 3 Mr. Cassell referred to our expert Phillip Esplin, 4 Dr. Esplin, and saying that he agreed not to refer to 5 as a prostitute. Your Honor, that came up in the 6 context of a cross examination in

rk, N.Y. March 31, 2017 10:10 a.m. HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND

ize the narrowness of our motion here. We seek to preclude evidence involving that litigation. Your Honor has already heard from my colleague, Ms. McCawley, who has presented our argument for why Dershowitz should not be in this case at all, and of course, if we prevail on point 1, this point becomes i

VOGIU1 53 1 these other things that are circulating about her that have 2 nothing to do with Ms. Maxwell. 3 Mr. Cassell referred to our expert Phillip Esplin, 4 Dr. Esplin, and saying that he agreed not to refer to 5 s a prostitute. Your Honor, that came up in the 6 context of a cross examination in

rk, N.Y. March 31, 2017 LO310 a.m, Before? HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FORE

hasize the narrowness of our motion here. We seek to preclud vidence involving that litigation. Your Honor has already heard from my colleague, Ms. McCawley, who has presented our argument for why Dershowitz should not be in this case at all, and of course, if we prevail on point 1, this point becomes i

24 25 53 H3VOGIU1 these other things that are circulating about her that have nothing to do with Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Cassell referred to our expert Phillip Esplin, Dr. Esplin, and saying that he agreed not to refer to Virginia Roberts as a prostitute. Your Honor, that came up in the context of a cross examina