Epstein Secrets

h Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards EXHIBIT L: Email String Between Peter Skinner and AUSA cc'ing Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley (Feb. 29, 2016—Mar. 5, 2016) (Sealed) EXHIBIT M: Emails between AUSA and Chief of the Criminal Division (Mar. 3, 2016) (Sealed) EXHIBIT N: Emails

cc'ing Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley (Feb. 29, 2016—Mar. 5, 2016) (Sealed) EXHIBIT M:

between AUSA and AUSA and other AUSAs (Nov. 30, 2018—Dec. 6, 2018) (Sealed) EXHIBIT O: Email from Stan Pottinger to AUSA cc'ing Brad Edwards and Sigrid McCawley, re Daniel Siad (Mar. 3, 2016) (Sealed) EXHIBIT P: Supplemental Privilege Log, Apr. 4, 2016 EXHIBIT Q: Defendant's Response in Opposition to Motio

I. The Government's Response to Maxwell's Motion. Confronted with evidence of AUSA misrepresentations to Judge McMahon, the government has filed a Response reluctantly admitting that the U.S. Attorney's Office had sustained contact with Boies Schiller in 2016. Even so, the government tries its best to m

served this Response to Plaintiff's Notice Of Intent To Offer Statements Under, If Necessary, The Residual Hearsay Rule via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale Lauderdale FL 33301 E I Bradley J. Edward

earsay Rule via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP

say without applicable exceptions, or based on other evidentiary grounds. Those issues will be argued at the appropriate time. For purposes of this Response, Ms. Maxwell simply notes the fundamental errors in the Notice, failure to comply with the rules, and general principles that make the residual hea

85, 90, 104 &106, Plaintiff could have — but did not - simply certify that she has produced the attachment. Entry 107 is an email from Plaintiff to McCawley and Edwards dated 9/7/2015, noted as "Providing information sought by attorneys to provide legal advice, with attachment." Entry 108 is an undated

t on June 6, 2016, I electronically served this Defendant's Reply In Support of Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Documents via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meridith Schultz BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 m i Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, J

irm that that his communications with Plaintiff regarding "media issues" were primarily for the purpose of providing legal advice. According to the Response "Ms. received legal advice from Mr. Pottinger regarding how to handle media inquiries in such a way as to not jeopardize her position in ongoing li