Epstein Secrets

lso containing discussion of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit). The Court should be aware that within approximately two hours of this exchange, Ms. McCawley. (David Boies’ law partner) released a statement on his behalf, which stated that Dershowitz was misrepresenting what happened: “Because the discussions that Mr. Bo

s’ law partner) released a statement on his behalf, which stated that Dershowitz was misrepresenting what happened: “Because the discussions that Mr. Boies had with Mr. Dershowitz were expressly privileged settlement discussions, Mr. Boies will not, at least at this time, describe what was actually sai

s to -~- to conceal the scope of -- of the -- of the operation. In addition to that, when I started to compare the Dave Rogers' flight logs with the David -- excuse me. I am going to get a drink. When I started to compare the -- oh, I'm sorry. I should be looking at the camera. When I started -- when

f Epstein’s victims and the general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Dershowitz Counterclaim at § 15 (quoting Joinder Motion at 4). Remarkably, having quoted at length from the Joinder Motion in his Counterclaim in this case, Dershowitz now seeks to have that very same lan

us waiving any claim of confidentiality regarding any retainer and fee agreement. [VERY IMPORTANT]: The timing of Jane Doe No. 3's retention of the Boies, Schiller & Flexner firm is relevant to determining when Jane Doe No. 3 first raised allegations against Dershowitz, and Edwards's and Cassell's cor

9 and that Epstein "kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to escape to a foreign country." Id. at 4. The Joinder Motion alleges that "Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe [No. 3], making her available for sex to politically-connected and financiall

showitz's need for the information requested outweighs any privacy interests held by Jane Doe No. 3. The timing of Jane Doe No. 3's retention of the Boies, Schiller & Flexner firm is relevant to determining when Jane Doe No. 3 first raised allegations against Dershowitz, and Edwards's and Cassell's co

9 and that Epstein "kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to escape to a foreign country." Id. at 4. The Joinder Motion alleges that "Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe [No. 3], making her available for sex to politically-connected and financiall