Epstein Secrets

ell, Defendant, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS. ii. The Names and Addresses and Telephone and Fax Numbers of Trial Counsel: Plaintiff's Trial Counsel: David Boies: Boies Schiller & Flexner 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Tel: 914-749-8200 Fax: 914-749-8300 [email protected] Sigrid McCawley: Boies Schil

on grounds of authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground. 17 EFTA00792772 Respectfully Submitted, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley(Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 40

ssary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores (expert) Plaintiff reserv

Maxwell, Defendant, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS. The Names and Addresses and Telephone and Fax Numbers of Trial Counsel: Plaintiff's Trial Counsel: David Boies: Boies Schiller & Flexner 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Tel: Fax: Sigrid McCawley: Boies Schiller & Flexner 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Sui

on grounds of authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground. 17 EFTA00617412 Respectfully Submitted, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley(Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 40

ssary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores (expert) Plaintiff reserv

following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boule

ff may present in her case-in-chief. Ms. Maxwell has filed well-founded motions in limine to exclude the testimony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report which explains that

ce on the same subject matter identified" in the expert report of another party, there would be no basis to for Dr. Esplin to testify if Kliman and Coonan are excluded. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)(ii). Moreover, because Dr. Esplin is a designated rebuttal expert, it is entirely improper to have any por