Epstein Secrets

mit the law firm of Boles Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply with a grand jury subpoena.

ated to by the parties, which afforded the parties the discretion to designate whatever they produced as 'confidential.'" Nielsen Co. (U.S.), LLC v. Success Sys., Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 83, 120 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). Blanket pretrial protective orders, drafted by the parties and "so ordered" by the court, are comm

the heart of the request, the Court was troubled to that replacement counsel for matter, learn i.e., Mr. at the June Cooper & Kirk, counsel, Boies had received from former Schiller Flexner,3 the Maxwell materials at issue in their entirety. Asked to explain how those materials came into the

rnal to the lawsuit in which it was entered" may be a dispositive factor in denying modification of a protective order. Nielsen Co. (U.S.), LLC v. Success Sys., Inc., 112 F. Supp.3d 83, 121 (S.D.N.Y. 2015); see also Jose Luis Pelaez, 312 F. Supp. 3d at 416-17. Here, there is no question that the plain ter

fre Action"), in order to permit the law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply

ulated to by the parties, which afforded the parties the discretion to designate whatever they produced as 'confidential.' Nielsen Co. (U.S), LLC v. Success Sys., Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 83, 120 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). Blanket pretrial protective orders, drafted by the parties and "so ordered" by the court, are comm