Epstein Secrets

mit the law firm of Boles Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply with a grand jury subpoena.

rial during the course of the litigation on the understanding that it will be kept confidential—for example, by .. . giving confidential testimony." Allen v. City of N.Y., 420 F. Supp. 2d 295, 300-01 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). The record shows that likely could not have secured Maxwell's deposition—at least in the abs

States Code, Section 1651, for an order relieving Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (the "Law Firm") of its o

f the litigation."). But this is not a case where the "conditions contemplated by the Court for revisiting the Protective Order have now occurred." Allen v. City of N.Y. 420 F. Supp. 2d 295, 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). All parties to the Protective Order have not been given notice and an opportunity to be heard. See

fre Action"), in order to permit the law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply

rial during the course of the litigation on the understanding that it will be kept confidential—for example, by .. . giving confidential testimony." Allen v. City of N.Y., 420 F. Supp. 2d 295, 300-01 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). The record shows that Giuffre likely could not have secured Maxwell's deposition—at least in