Epstein Secrets

YOU LIKE THE FBI NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED? WE BOTH KNOW DS THE ANSWER IS YES. IF YOU CAN WASTE POLICE RESOURCES INVESTIGATING ANDREW ON BEHALF OF DAVID BOIES YOU CAN MAKE AN EFFORT TO REVIEW MY EVIDENCE AND GO OVER EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED WHILST I LIVED IN THE UK AS A BRITISH CITIZEN! WHY IS THIS RELEVA

U. WATCHING YOU S DC- Below is an email from I have no communication with her and would like to file a restraining order against her too including David and Sigrid I believe is still your client? I know is represented by Jennifer Freeman hey Sigrid. You know James Marsh and Jennifer Freeman that D

RESOURCES INVESTIGATING ANDREW ON BEHALF OF DAVID BOIES YOU CAN MAKE AN EFFORT TO REVIEW MY EVIDENCE AND

against James Marsh, Jennifer Freeman, Robert Lewis, Brad Edwards and Britney. I would also like them to pay the my full settlement!! DC as long as Boles Schiller trades in the UK which it does AS THEY HAVE AN OFFICE IN LONDON IT IS IN YOUR AREA BY THE WAY. DC Stan Pottinger openly hit on me repeatedly. He tr

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

gain cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obta

n ongoing campaign to vilify Ms. Maxwell." (Def. Mot. 7 at 16). She again cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obtain materials from the Giuffre civil litigation. (Id.). Leaving aside the fact that, as set forth in Section IV, the Government obtained su

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

gain cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obta

n ongoing campaign to vilify Ms. Maxwell." (Def. Mot. 7 at 16). She again cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obtain materials from the Giuffre civil litigation. (Id.). Leaving aside the fact that, as set forth in Section IV, the Government obtained su

gain cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obta

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

n ongoing campaign to vilify Ms. Maxwell." (Def. Mot. 7 at 16). She again cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obtain materials from the civil litigation. (Id.). Leaving aside the fact that, as set forth in Section IV, the Government obtained such mate

ent: Tuesda March 30 2021 10:21 AM To: Subject: Boies Schiller--Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order

From: To: aNYS)" Subject: RE: Boles Schiller--Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:34:50 +0000 This is a 2019 order that was recently unsealed. We made an applicat

T OF HER MOTION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, MARTINDELL, AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203

explain this in more detail. Maxwell Pre-Trial Mot. Nos. 4 8c 5. But the point is this: The defamation case should have been extremely narrow, but Boies Schiller transformed it into something much broader—a proxy prosecution of Epstein and Maxwell for allegedly trafficking and abusing Giuffre, which

otes of the February 29 meeting show that Boies Schiller promised to send the government "depositions," Reply ISO Mot. to Suppress, Ex. J, p 8, and David Boies later complained about his frustration that the government had not yet charged 10 EFTA00019011 --- PAGE BREAK --- Maxwell with perjury.; There a

An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From Boles Schiller, And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence 11 I. The role of protective orders in civil litigation 11 2. The go

Judge McMahon that the prosecutors had no idea what was in Boies Schiller's file. Indeed, he insisted, there had been no contact whatsoever between Boies Schiller and United States Attorney's Office before the government commenced its investigation. Nor, said the prosecutor, did Boies Schiller have a

, AUSA met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who "urged to open an investigation of Epstein and Maxwell!' Then, after Maxwell's two depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016, asking "if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury."