Epstein Secrets

mit the law firm of Boles Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply with a grand jury subpoena.

e whenever discovery materials were filed with the court under seal. In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 148 (2d Cir. 1987) (Agent Orange). In recent years, however, the Second Circuit has relaxed the Rule 26(c) "good cause" showing for discovery materials that are never filed with th

o unseal discovery materials in the possession of Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (the "A in connection w

is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court."' TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

o unseal discovery materials in the possession of Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (the "A in connection wi

r is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court" TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

o unseal discovery materials in the possession of Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (the "Application"), in c

is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court."' TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

o unseal discovery materials in the possession of Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP the "A in connection wit

is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court."' TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

fre Action"), in order to permit the law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply

e whenever discovery materials were filed with the court under seal. In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 148 (2d Cir. 1987) (Agent Orange). In recent years, however, the Second Circuit has relaxed the Rule 26(c) "good cause" showing for discovery materials that are never filed with th

d message: From: < Date: August 11, 2016 at 7:52:12 PM PDT To: < Subject: FW: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur From: Pizzurro, Frank (LA) Date: Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM To: Dunlavey, Dean (OC) < Schecter, Daniel (CC) 4 Mohebbi, Nima

on said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David Boies - argued that the bank resorted to "pure extortion" in an attempt to get its way. As a result of the bank's criminal complaint, InfoSpan alleged Bajw

ay. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litig