Epstein Secrets

involved return of a large sum of money to the Plaintiffs. 1 ROTHSTEIN HOSENFIZOT ADLEFt Las OW City Centre, 401E. Las Ohs Roulccird, Suite 1650, Fon Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00795682 6. Upon receipt of the orders, the undersigned began to put into place all actions necessary to timely comply witivs

AKA: BAY 1 PORTS1DE l ir (RPI3) 1012 East Broward B ard, as "Defendant and easeme 6 31.74, N 24.00, E 49.07 TO FOB umber of 5042 23 28 0010; rt Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to ' i des all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments therein or thereon, and is more particularly descr

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's prin Broward County. L BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLU ION The Firm 8;

case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to (1 1,,2003.> Yes S. No this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to 11, 1999? _ Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No Does this case originate from a matter pend

s involved return of a large sum of money to the Plaintiffs. 1 ROTHSTEIN ROSEATELOT Anwi LAS OW City Centre, 401E. Las Ohs Bouleyard, Suite 1650, Fors Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00729498 6. Upon receipt of the orders, the undersigned began to put into place all actions necessary to timely comply with s

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTIO

nate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes S. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes I_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a ma

rn of a large sum of money to the . - . Plaintiffs. 1 RalliSTEIN HOSEATF-1.1.11ADLER Las Olas City Centre, 401E- Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fon Lauderdale, Florida 3.T301 EFTA00223362 6. Upon receipt of the orders, the undersigned began to put into place all actions necessary to timely comply wittc

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the fine's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTIO

te from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes —IL_ No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes .X___. No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes No 9. Does this case originate from a matte

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTIO

inate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? ___ Yes No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? — Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? — Yes No 9. Does this case originatefrom a matt

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL. 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTI

e from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes _X_. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1,1999? Yes _X_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a matter