Epstein Secrets

Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment privileges afforded him under the United States Constitution. Mr. Kuvin also knew an order was issued in the related Federal Court proceedings sustaining Epstein's 5th Amendment privilege as to questions that, if answered, EFTA00728127 v. stein ase No. 2008CA037319XXXXMBAB

rtunately for Mr. Kuvin, this conduct is in direct contravention with his client's wish to remain anonymous. 19. In Doe v. Leolev, 185 F.R.D. 605 (D. Ct. NV 1999), a sexual harassment case, the court reasoned that there is no express or implied right to bring an action anonymously. Id. at 606. Moreo

t four digits), but agreed that the subpoenas filed with the clerk would be redacted. Several attorneys agreed to this procedure in those cases. In Federal Court, subpoenas are not filed with the clerk. Thus, in this matter, the undersigned offered to serve the third-party subpoenas with plaintiffs full name

recover. It is the undersigned's experience that once identified, witnesses begin to come forward. See supra. 13. In Doe v. Leoley 185 F.R.D. 605 (D. Ct. NV 1999), a sexual harassment case, the court reasoned that there is no express or implied right to bring an action anonymously. Id. at 606. Moreo

t four digits), but agreed that the subpoenas filed with the clerk would be redacted. Several attorneys agreed to this procedure in those cases. In Federal Court, subpoenas are not filed with the clerk. Thus, in this matter, the undersigned offered to serve the third-party subpoenas with plaintiff's full nam

ecover. It is the undersigned's experience that once identified, witnesses begin to come forward. See supra. 12. In Doe v. Leolev, 185 F.R.D. 605 (D. Ct. NV 1999), a sexual harassment case, the court reasoned that there is no express or implied right to bring an action anonymously. Id. at 606. Moreo