Epstein Secrets

ds strict proof thereof. 7. Epstein denies Paragraph 7, except for the allegation therein stating that Edwards is involved in pending litigation in Federal Court under the Federal Crime Victims' Right's Act. 8. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragrapgh 8 and demands strict proof there

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XxxxmBAG PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPST

s strict proof thereof. 7. Epstein denies Paragraph 7. except for the allegation therein stating that Edwards is involved in pending litigation in Federal Court under the Federal Crime Victims' Right's Act. 8. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragrapgh 8 and demands strict proof there

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPST

h apparently he has, which is that the 21 $50,000 or $150,000 floor under 2255 also would be a cap. That 22 if they were to proceed to file suit in Federal Court to get 23 fair damages under 2255, Mr. Epstein would admit liability, but 24 he, of course, could fight the damages portion, which means 25 that,

TA00180369 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 27 of 100 nsor R Associates Rernninp and Tranicriptinch Mc. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXX STATE OF FLORIDA, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defenda

etain him and/or his firm in litigation against me; b. That Edwards continues to actively prosecute a case against the United States of America in Federal Court with the intention of nullifying an agreement between the United States of America and myself; c. That to achieve these goals, Edwards uses highly

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG JUDGE: CROW Defendants. PLAINTIFF/C

e? MR. GoLDBERGER: Yee. THE COURT' As opposed to any criminal prosecution going on? MR. GOLDBERGER: It is civil proceedings that are going on in Federal Court. But in the interest of comedy, Your Honor, the Court has ruled on the confidentiality agreement and has put a well reasoned procedure into place.

egulation, Case No. 91-2108 (Fla. 2d Jud. Cir.), Order Releasing Public Records dated September 20, 1991 7 8 2 EFTA00233745 oq-a-3-714 1. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION CASE MOs.: 2006-CF9454 AXX and 2008-CP9381 AXX STATE OF