Epstein Secrets

4-2822 E-mail: [email protected] And Paul G. Cassell Pro I lac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone:801-585-5202 Facsimile:801-585-6833 [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Does 1 and 2 This daytime business addres

ictims and the Government agree that the relevant legal standard governing the question of waiver of work-production protections comes from Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 676-77 (S.D. Fla. 2008), which held that "a party waives work-product privilege protection when (1) assertion of the protection re

el: (954 524-2820• Fax: 954 524-2822 E-mail: Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Tel: (801) 585-5202. Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN

rning its internal deliberations while making representations regarding those deliberations to obtain summary judgment." D.E. 414 at 1. In Stern v. O'Quinn 253 F.R.D. 663 (S.D.Fla. 2008), the district court identified two ways in which the attorney work-product doctrine could be waived. An "implied wai

VE FL 4 NEW YORK, NY 10022-6146 NEW YORK COUNTY I Addressing 8 Letter Service I Newspaper facility Home Health Care Facility 29: 4315 S 2700 W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84184-0001 SALT LAKE COUNTY For internal use only SONY_GM_00059510 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.gtf;;?N(F IDENTIAL DS-SDNY-0022334 EFT

(See DE 238-1) (discussing documents prepared by the United States Attorney's Office in anticipation of possible Epstein prosecution); see Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 675 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (Rosenbaum, Mag. J.) (relying on allegations within pleading to decide application of work product privilege)