Epstein Secrets

527-8663 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 362 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2009 Page 11 of 11 Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue Nor

evidence. Even so, at this juncture, it is without question that same is discoverable. Admissibility can be handled on another date. See Fajardo v. Pierce County, 2009 WL 1765756 (W.D. Wash. 2009)(allegations of specific disorders amount to more than garden variety disorders and thus Plaintiff waived physici

527-8663 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 2

I (Sexual Battery), '][199.) 13 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2009 Page 14 of 22 Page 14 See Fajardo v. Pierce County, 2009 WL 1765756 (W.D. Wash. 2009)(allegations of specific disorders amount to more than garden variety disorders and thus Plaintiff waived physicia

527-8663 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 273 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2009 Page 11 of 11 Suite 404 Lak

79, 85, 91, 97, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 133, 139, 145, 151, 157, 163, 169, 175, 181, 187, 193; Count XXXI (Sexual Battery), iJl99.) See Fajardo v. Pierce County, 2009 WL 1765756 (W.D. Wash. 2009)(allegations of specific disorders amount to more than garden variety disorders and thus Plaintiff waived physici

RMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 If

ress acts to amend a statute, we presume it intends its amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), and Pierce County v. Guillen, 537 U.S. 129, 145 (2003)(rejecting an argument under which a statutory amendment "would protect from disclosure only information that wa