Epstein Secrets

s Obispo, California Gulfstream G-650 7/10/2015 Santa Fe, New Mexico Ft Collins, Colorado Gulfstream G-450 6/23/2015 Santa Monica, California Salt Lake City, Utah Gulfstream G-200 6/25/2015 Scottsdale, Arizona Santa Barbara, California Piaggio Avanti 7/20/2015 Stuart, Florida N. Kingstown, Rhode I

yannis, Massachusetts Hawker 800XP 6/25/2015 Middletown, Rhode Island Philadelphia, Pennsylvania King Air 6100 6/24/2015 Milwaukee, Wisconsin Clearwater, Florida Embraer 120 7/22/2015 Milwaukee, Wisconsin Clearwater, Florida Embraer 120 7/21/2015 Minocqua, Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin King

v-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 1 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E Mail: [email protected] 11 U• U. U. U L Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney f

causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising. Inc. v. City of Clearwater. Fla. 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11h Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim a denial of access as an

-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 0.6% 0.3% 39 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 0.5% 0.5% v v 40 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 05% 04% te 41 Salt Lake City, UT 0.5% 04% v v 42 Raleigh, NC 0.5% 0.5% v v v 43 Providence- Warwick, RI-MA 05% 04% v 44 Richmond, VA 05% 04% ve a oe 45 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 0

% aa 23 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 0.9% 14% a 24 Austin-Round Rock, TX 08% 0.7% oS v 25 Pittsburgh, PA 0.8% 0.6% v 26 Tampa-St. Petersburg- Clearwater, FL 0.8% 0.9% v v v 27 |ndianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 0.8% 0.6% v v v 28 Cleveland- Elyria, OH 0.8% 0.7% v v 29 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 08% 0.6% ¥ v P

-cv-Ek, . 36-KAM Document 3, Enterea FLSD Docket 10/16/26.4 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners Pro

causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. I. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11ffi Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim a denial of access as

8-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mall: Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonv

e causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc.,. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11th Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim a denial of access as a

8-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonv

causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising. Inc. v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11th Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement,, they cannot claim a denial of access as an

e 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonv

causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11th Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim a denial of access as a