Epstein Secrets

4-2822 E-mail: [email protected] And Paul G. Cassell Pro I lac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone:801-585-5202 Facsimile:801-585-6833 [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Does 1 and 2 This daytime business addres

oth the victims and the Government agree that the relevant legal standard governing the question of waiver of work-production protections comes from Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 676-77 (S.D. Fla. 2008), which held that "a party waives work-product privilege protection when (1) assertion of the pr

el: (954 524-2820• Fax: 954 524-2822 E-mail: Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Tel: (801) 585-5202. Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN

trine in this case does not "deny the opposing party access to information vital to its defense." Stern, 253 F.R.D. at 676. In that case, plaintiff Stern was suing defendant O'Quinn, and O'Quinn's law firm, for defamation. O'Quinn had instituted an investigation of plaintiff Stern, which was conducted

g the grant of summary judgment.”); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under R

S, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 [email protected] /s/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmo

FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] 2 Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 [email protected] /s/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmo

ying amendment where “addition of more plaintiffs .. . would not have affected the issues underlying the grant of summary judgment.”’); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under Rule 15, “courts have held that leave to amend to assert a claim already at issue in [another lawsuit

Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, By: Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF UTAH,' 383 University Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, By: Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell: HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C., 150 East 10th Avenue, Denver, CO 8

issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power" and "the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts." See id.; Stern v. Cosby, 529 F.Supp.2d 417, 420 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (internal citations omitted) ("the court must determine the weight of the presumption, that is, whe