Epstein Secrets

be due until 30 days after a court ruling on jurisdiction. That way, your brief would still be in and counted — does that resolve your concern? And Dexter, what is your position on all this? (Or can you provide the name and e-mail of the attorney handling the appellate issues?) I'm assuming that the G

o: Jackie Perczek Brad Edwards ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MID as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Hi Jackie, Thanks for getting back to us so quickly. We have always appreciated your collegiality on these issues as well (and we know that your firm has qui

r position on whether you would oppose a ten-day extension of time (to and including August 6, 2013), for the victims to respond to the motion. (And Dexter — we would like your position on an extension as well.) Thanks for your attention to these issues. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 a

rad Edwards ([email protected]); Marvin Simeon Subject: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Dear Jackie, We read with interest Epstein's recent motion for "Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in

o: Jackie Perczek Cc: Brad Edwards ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MTD as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Dexter — What is the Government's view on all this? Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for lane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce P

209322 Cc USAFLS); Brad Edwards ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MTD as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Hi Jackie, Thanks for getting back to us so quickly. We have always appreciated your collegiality on these issues as well (and we know that your firm has qui

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law From: Jackie Peraek Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:27 AM To: Paul Cassell Cc: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Brad Edwards Subject: Re: Position on Renewed Motion for Expedited Ruling Hi Paul. The Court's August 13

[email protected]> Subject: RE: Position on Renewed Motion for Expedited Ruling Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:11:53 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks Jackie — we'll note your opposition. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law From: Jackie Peraek Sent: Thursday, Sep

arti, it's .net (you have .ent). From: Paul Cassell [mailto:cassellpOlaw.utah.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:40 PM To: Jackie Perczek; Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); owlmgwOattent; Maria Kelljchian (maria(apathtojustice.com) Cc: Brad Edwards (brad(4athtojustice.com); Marvin Simeon Subject: Epstein's Re

5 PM To: Jackie Perczek; Brad Edwards ([email protected]) Maria Kelljchian ([email protected]) Subject: RE: complete email list Thanks Jackie. who do you want on the list? Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law From: Jackie Perczek imallto:JPerczekei