Epstein Secrets

une, 2009. Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre AC14 I OCfl And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Ll 19 EFTA00234889 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 20 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MA

red on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 28 of 41 I swear the foregoing to be truthful under the penalty of perjury. FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. aul G. Cassell EFTA00234898 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 29 of 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRI

financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. 3. Accord

n direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable.'" United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Hatchett, 31 F.3d 1411, 1421 (7th Cir. 1994)). For all these reasons, the Court should conclude that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. 11 EFTA

id [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsbe rg@pod h u rst.com Adam D. Horowitz ahorowit

financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ,r 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. 3. Accor

n direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable."' United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Hatchett, 31 F.3d 1411, 1421 (7th Cir. 1994 )). For all these reasons, the Court should conclude that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. 11 C

all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claims (Motion in Limine 17) «0.0... eeeeeeeeees 26 18. The Cassell/Edwards v. Dershowitz litigation is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 18) oo. eeeesseesseceseesseesseceseesseesseceseesseeeseeeseeessesseessa

7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) oo. ceiceeccssseeseceseesseeeseesseeeeecseessaeeseeesneeees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir, 1990) oo. eee ceeeesseeseeeseeeseeeseesseeeseeenaeeees 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 20

I electronically served this Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion In Limine via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell Meredith Schultz 383 S. University Street BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake City, UT 84112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 P| Ft. Lau

ion in Limine 17) ................0005 26 18. The Cassell/Edwards v. Dershowitz litigation is relevant and

7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) o.oo ccecccecccccccceccceesccessscssseecneeeesstecsseeenees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir. 1990) oo... cccccc cee ceececeeeeeseeessesenees 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR—-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 2011) ..

. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 StanPottinger@