Epstein Secrets

ntiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. 16 MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. 17 S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff 18 BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. 19 HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24 25

ive value that's past 8 sexual assault that Ms. experienced as a child is 9 completely swallowed by the prejudicial effect on the jury. 10 MR. CASSELL: Your Honor, I think I'm the next one up. 11 For purposes of clarity, we're up to point number 7 in our 12 omnibus motion. 13 This one I think

that overview. 2 They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise 3 that we think is very instructive on this particular point. 4 Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that in a 5 defamation case there is more latitude to introducing 6 reputational types of evidence. However, it's important to

UTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794625 71 H3V0GIU1 1 so let meet respond to that overview. 2 They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise 3 that we think is very instructive on this particular point. 4 Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that in a 5 defamation ca

eys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTER

nestly be another mini trial and would take us far afield of what facts are relevant to this case. And again, any minor probative value that's MR. CASSELL: Your Honor, I think I'm the next one up. For purposes of clarity, we're up to point number 7 in our omnibus motion. This one I think is just a ve

spond to that overview. They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise that we think is very instructive on this particular point. Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that in a defamation case there is more latitude to introducing reputational types of evidence. However, it's important to remem

7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3V0GIU1 -1 so let meet respond to that overview. They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise that we think is very instructive on this particular point. Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that in a defamation case there

ttorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT R (212) 805

tive value that's past sexual assault that Ms. Giuffre experienced as a child is completely swallowed by the prejudicial effect on the jury. r MR. CASSELL: Your Honor, I think I'm the next one up. For purposes of clarity, we're up to point number 7 in our omnibus motion. This one I think is just a ver

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 val H3VOGIU1 so let meet respond to that overview. They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise that we think is very instructive on this particular point. Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that ina defamation case there i

spond to that overview. They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise that we think is very instructive on this particular point. Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that ina defamation case there is more latitude to introducing reputational types of evidence. However, it's important to rememb