Epstein Secrets

75 E-mail: brad ®pathtojustice.com and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: brad ®pathtojustice.com and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile:

epartment having control over the requested information who must explain why revealing the information would compromise deliberative processes. See Landry v. F.D.I.C., 204 F.3d 1125, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Final Decision Exempted from Privilege — Any deliberative process privilege would only cover onl

order to that effect is attached to this pleading. DATED: August 1, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice I0 EFTA00208765 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I cert

dley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice I0 EFTA00208765 Case 9:08-cv-80

having control over the requested information who must explain in detail why revealing the information would compromise deliberative processes. See Landry' 204 F.3d 1125, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 2000). 4 EFTA00208759 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Page 5 of 11 Inves

Sigrid S. McCawley Meridith Schultz Boors, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FiSTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street J. Stanley Pottinger SIM Is/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 10 EFTA00097405

intiff by her attorneys, Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. Menningcr DecL, Ex. A, p. 4. The very first lin

ion would result in more than ten depositions being taken ...."); accord Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes,104 F.Supp.2d 334, 342 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Landry v. St. James Parish Sch. Rd., No. Civ. A 99-1438, 2000 WL 1741886, at •2 (E.D.La. Nov. 22, 2000). The purpose of Rule 30(a)(2)(A) is to "enable cou

aims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013925 Thru P-013927 Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correction Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; No

075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 1 EFTA00179619 Case 9:08-cv-807

epartment having control over the requested information who must explain why revealing the information would compromise deliberative processes. See Landry v. F.D.LC., 204 F.3d 1125, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Final Decision Exempted from Privilege — Any deliberative process privilege would only cover only