Epstein Secrets

anted our motion to compel. Looking forward to moving the case towards a resolution. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101 Salt Lake

If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: M, (USAFLS) [ Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 5:24 PM To: Paul

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

D.E. U 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[t]he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of

rd to getting those discovery materials and moving the case forward to a resolution. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake Ci

If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: M, (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Monday, June 24 2013 5:25 PM To

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

TA00205274 I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[t]he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of

anted our motion to compel. Looking forward to moving the case towards a resolution. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on htt

If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 5:24 PM To: Paul Cassell; Valac

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

D.E. # 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[tjhe government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of

the Court has ordered them produced. Please let us know if you have any questions. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake Ci

If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. EFTA00205418

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

D.E. # 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "(t)he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of

e it would be in the Government's EFTA00209340 interest to endorse. Sincerely, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for lane Doe ttl. and Jane Doe tt2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake Ci

If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursda , June 27, 2013 7:16 AM To: ,

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

D.E. U 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[t]he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry o

n on the motion. Please let us know when it would be convenient to confer. Sincerely, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Subject: RE: Are you going to confer with us? It has been nearly two weeks since we sent this request to you, and we haven't heard anything back fr

e #2 Paul G. Cassell EFTA00209563 error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 6:46 PM Subject: R

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

D.E. # 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[t]he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of

PM To: . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Judge Marra's Order Granting the Victims' Motion to Compel Discovery Within 30 Days The order sent by Cassell is DE 190, issued on June 18, 2013. I have gone through my CM/ECF, and do not find any DE 190. DE 189 is the order denying our motion to dismiss, wh

anted our motion to compel. Looking forward to moving the case towards a resolution. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah (phone) EFTA00209802 You can acces

electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the b

D.E. # 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[t]he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of