Epstein Secrets

emain open. 6 EFTA00724386 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 7 of 7 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassellp©law.utah.edu CERTIFICAT

of 7 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma

2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] 7 EFTA00

075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma

emain open. 6 EFTA00601927 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 7 of 7 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 MEN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 13, 2010 I electronically fi

of 7 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma