Epstein Secrets

course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court making "a specific finding of mis

Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's

equitable remedy."). And the CVRA is obviously "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its remedial purposes. Edwards v. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008). A good illustration of the broad power of district courts to remedy CVRA violations comes from the Fifth Circu

course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court making "a specific finding of mis

Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's

te equitable remedy."). And the CVRA is obviously "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its remedial purposes. Edwards. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008). A good illustration of the broad power of district courts to remedy CVRA violations comes from the Fifth Circu

y J. Edwards FARMER. JAFFE. WLETSSINrk 17 EFTA00208010 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 28 of 29 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 28 EFTA00208011 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 05:022011 Pag

LSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 28 of 29 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane

e the more expansive interpretation. Not only is the CVRA "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its purposes, Edwards. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008), but the sponsors of the CVRA stated that the right to confer was "intended to be expansive. For 4 Interestingly

red on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 28 of 29 EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake Cit UT 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe

. On August 14, 2008, a hearing was held, during which a stipulated set of facts was discussed: THE COURT: So if I can hear from Mr. Edwards or Mr. Cassell first what the Plaintiffs' position [is] as far as where we stand on the record in terms of whether I need additional facts, evidence, or there's g

the more expansive interpretation. Not only is the CVRA "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its purposes, Edwards v. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008), but the sponsors of the CVRA stated that the right to confer was "intended to be expansive. For Interestingly,