Epstein Secrets

33301 Telephon Facsimile E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

FE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Telephon Facsimile E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake Cit UT 84112 Telephone Facsimile: E-Mail Attorne

(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Circuit Courts have applied varying tests for articulating how to determine when an amendment relates back to the filing of the original pleading. In the Eleventh

February 6.2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes o

G, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane

(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Circuit Courts have applied varying tests for articulating how to determine when an amendment relates back to the filing of the original pleading. In the Eleventh

AFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimi E-mail and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Lake Salt Lake Cit UT 84112 Telephone Facsimile: E-Mail:

a 33301 Telephone Facsimi E-mail and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of law at the

(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Circuit Courts have applied varying tests for articulating how to determine when an amendment relates back to the filing of the original pleading. In the Eleventh

ING, P.L. DWARDS. FIST0S & LEHRMAN, and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hoc Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

February 6. 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE. WEISSING, P.L. DWARDS. FIST0S & LEHRMAN, and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hoc Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 • This daytime business address is

(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Circuit Courts have applied varying tests for articulating how to determine when an amendment relates back to the filing of the original pleading. In the Eleventh