Epstein Secrets

018. B~I JA LL Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No.: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 And By: /s! Paul G. Cassell PAUL G. CASSELL S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University St. 84112 casse p aw.uta .edu Utah Bar #6078 Admitted

250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 And By: /s! Paul G. Cassell PAUL G. CASSELL S.J. Quinney College of Law at

violation of a federal bankruptcy court order. See Supplement to Edwards' Mot. to Strike, Exhibit B at pp. 1-3. In particular, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Florida entered an explicit order that Epstein's attorneys (at the Fowler White law firm)

y of May, 2018. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the undersigned attorney is appearing pro hac vice in this matter pursuant to court order dated May 4, 2018. Paul G. Cassell, Esq. S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: (801) 585-5202 (above for

rsuant to court order dated May 4, 2018. Paul G. Cassell, Esq. S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Univer

ed by the undersigned in violation of an order from U.S. I EFTA00808132 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 6 Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. See DE 1194, In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, P.A., No. 09-34791-RBR. If you are in

t representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those representations during the hearing as well. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added). Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar representation be made by Fowler White. In response, the Court referenced a "blanket confidentiality

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added). Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar r

as occurred. The issue of compliance by Fowler White and/or Epstein with the Bankruptcy Court's November 2010 Agreed Order, issued by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray (the "November 2010 Agreed Order"), is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for t

ivilege" (only 19 were communications with a client as determined by the description in the privilege log). 17 EFTA00794293 Despite Edwards' and Paul Cassell's (counsel for the Intervenors) protestations to the contrary, this Court can plainly see that not a single one of the 30 e-mails are attorney-client

hat not a single one of the 30 e-mails are attorney-client privileged communications between Edwards (or any other co-counsel) and Edwards' and Mr. Cassell's three tort clients (L.M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Rather, the majority of the documents are e- mails among attorneys and staff within RRA, with Mr. Cass

ion was completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Show Cause proceedings before The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, to occur before this Court proceeded with this review. With trial approaching