Epstein Secrets

the Appendix with a written Order as soon as it is entered by the circuit court. 2 At the March 8, 2018 hearing, University of Utah Law Professor, Paul G. Cassell, Esq., appeared pro hac vice below for non-parties L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, on a limited confidentiality issue not before this Court. On behalf of

n-parties L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, on a limited confidentiality issue not before this Court. On behalf of non-parties, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, Mr. Cassell filed an Unopposed Emergency Motion to Intervene to Protect Confidentiality of Privileged and Otherwise Protected Materials and to Seek Other Appro

d from this case on August 9, 2010. (App. 5). 5 EFTA00793697 all claims in the December 7, 2009 Complaint. (App. 4). Rothstein retained counsel, Mark Nurik, who moved to set aside the default, but an order was never entered on that motion. Mr. Nurik has not withdrawn from this case and has been on the

Complaint. (App. 4). Rothstein retained counsel, Mark Nurik, who moved to set aside the default, but an order was never entered on that motion. Mr. Nurik has not withdrawn from this case and has been on the service list since 2010. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothste

vestigation, sent an email to Edwards stating that "our best bet is to go after those close to Epstein"; f) In July, 2009, Edwards and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails about their lack of proof on a previously-filed motion, which claimed that Epstein was moving his assets to avoid paying any judg

f) In July, 2009, Edwards and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails about their lack of proof on a

assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein; g) On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On - 6 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POI

ORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044 EFTA00584200 Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Second Amended Complaint that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research o

f Investigation, sent an email to Edwards stating that "our best bet is to go after those close to Epstein"; In July, 2009, Edwards and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails about their lack of proof on a previously-filed motion, which claimed that Epstein was moving his assets to avoid paying any judg

in"; In July, 2009, Edwards and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails about their lack of proof on a

assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein; g) On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein reg

as sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research o

ast or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: A. Paul Cassell; B. Spencer Kuvin; C. Stuart Mermelstein; D. any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents

volving or alleged to involve Epstein: A. Paul Cassell; B. Spencer Kuvin; C. Stuart Mermelstein; D.

including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases agains

m Beach, Florida, 33409 38. c/o Bradley Edwards, Esq. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 39. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 40. c/o Adam Horowitz FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2

VE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 39. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City U

S. Ross, Gs q. 155. 156. Alfredo Rodriguez 11349 SW 86TH LN, Miami, FL C/O Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 157. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00798057 2. Each contested factual issue expected to be addressed by th

for very, very high number of -- in dollars 1 4 5 4 s * Is II 12 13 IS Is 14 17 Is Is 20 21 22 23 24 25 35 But you do recall Paul Cassell 's involvement. What about other local lawyers? Wore there other local lawyers who were participants in the prosecution of she cases against Jeffrey

cases after he joined ARA. Be had already filed these cases, I believe. I know ho had shoe -- the ladies as clients before he joined the firm. And Cassell was co-counsel with him on those. So in terns of attorneys that were co-counsel wish ua, he was a co-counsel representing the three young woman th

f them wore appealed. I wa➢ reversed a number of times. 23 0 Rough gue➢➢? 24 A I Couldn't tell you. I couldn't tell you how 2S many [limos. Nurik or Rothstein -- did they feel bullied or 2 threatened by Epstein lawyer➢? MR. SCAAOLA: Objection, predicate. 4 THE WITNESS: You are assuming tha

ast or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: A. Paul Cassell; B. Spencer Kuvin; C. Stuart Mermelstein; D. any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents

volving or alleged to involve Epstein: A. Paul Cassell; B. Spencer Kuvin; C. Stuart Mermelstein; D.

without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Roberts, Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases agains

Jim McCay Larry Yogel Alan Weinstein, investment broker FROM BRADLEY EDWARDS DEPO Maria Kelljian Beth Williamson Michael Fisten Dean Howell Paul Cassell Ken Jenne Bill Berger Richard Fandry Jane Muskrat Michelle Daryan Chislaine Maxwell Paralegal Paralegal Investigator Referred E.W. case aga

eth Williamson Michael Fisten Dean Howell Paul Cassell Ken Jenne Bill Berger Richard Fandry Jane Mus

evin Ira Sochet Mark Melvin Jack Samoney Lawrence King Steve Jackel Michael Legamaro Kevin Draber David Boden Andrew Barnett Alan Sakowitz Mark Nurik Mark Fistos Tommy Mottola Officer Recarey Interviewed by Michael Fisten Investigator FBI Agent FBI Agent US Attorney Rothstein's right arm

referred .'s case. 9 Q. And the other two cases is he is shown as 10 the referring lawyer? 11 A. Yes. 12 Q. There is also a person named Cassell who I 13 think is an attorney from Utah? 14 A. Okay. 15 Q. Do you recognize the name? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. Okay. And what's his first name?

9680 Page 20 1 behalf; that is, who purports to represent 2 Mr. Rothstein since you left the firm that day? 3 A. No. 4 Q. Do you know Mr. Nurik? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Do you recog -- are you aware that he 7 represents Mr. Rothstein? A. Yes. 9 Q. Okay. Have you spoken with him since that