Epstein Secrets

February 6.2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for the victims This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not i

G, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for the victims This da

tims' all agree. Given entirely reasonable. Indeed, any other course would have been foolhardy. 4 The Government's concession readily distinguishes Center for Biological Diversity. Hamilton, 453 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2006), which is clearly not an "ancillary criminal proceeding," but rather a civil enforcement action of the En

e, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 13 EFTA00210906 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 14 of 14 Paul G. Cassell Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. Th11O—annnaslani.sla Attorneys fo

on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 14 of 14 Paul G. Cassell Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy

98 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 6 of 14 limitations, no period of limitations applies, is refuted by Center for Biological Diversity.' That case dealt with the interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, and in particular, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(1)(C). 453 F.3d at 1334. The Eleven

ING, P.L. DWARDS. FIST0S & LEHRMAN, and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hoc Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

February 6. 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE. WEISSING, P.L. DWARDS. FIST0S & LEHRMAN, and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hoc Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 • This daytime business address is

tims' all agree. Given entirely reasonable. Indeed, any other course would have been foolhardy. 4 The Government's concession readily distinguishes Center for Biological Diversity v. Hamilton, 453 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2006), which is clearly not an "ancillary criminal proceeding," but rather a civil enforcement action of the