Epstein Secrets

utrageous 24 career-destroying allegations without even calling 25 me and asking me if I would deny it or have any Bradley Edwards and Professor Paul Cassell alleging fabricated false charges against you, correct? MR. SCOTT: Objection, argumentative, mass media, et cetera. They began it. It is my belie

6 was -- the answer was interrupted. 17 A. Okay. Let me continue. That I never had 12:26:42 18 any sexual contact with because 19 Professor Cassell insisted on conveying to the 20 public that he was a former judge and that he was a 21 professor and that he was using, improperly in my 22 vie

:26:42 18 any sexual contact with because 19 Professor Cassell insisted on conveying to the 20 public that he

ading hoping to get judicial immunity, yes, at 4 that point the appropriate response is in the court 5 of public opinion. 6 That's what Justice Blackmun said in a 15:46:00 7 concurring opinion in the Supreme Court, that the 8 duty of a lawyer does not stop at the courtroom door 9 but it continu

- are 6 entitled to assert the innocence of their clients. 7 That's what lawyers do all the time. I'm 8 sure you've done it. I'm sure Professor Cassell has 9 done it. I'm sure Mr. Scarola has done it. And 10 none of us ever want to be judged on our credibility 11 by pleading a client nonguilty

l the time. I'm 8 sure you've done it. I'm sure Professor Cassell has 9 done it. I'm sure Mr. Scarola has done it

talk about my client being presumed 14 innocent, my client being innocent. That's part of 15 the role of a criminal defense lawyer. Justice 16 Blackmun has said that the criminal defense lawyer's 17 role does not end in a courtroom, it continues to 18 the courthouse steps. 19 And so when my cli

ictims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules o Criminal Procedure 2007 Reporter 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861 * Length: 59852 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah, Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 2002-07. Thanks to

in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 835, 852-924 [hereinafter Cassell, Proposed Amendments]. 5 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (a)(8). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017637 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 3 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *865

the concerns of the victims and the community in knowing that offenders are being brought to account for their criminal conduct." 37> And as Justice Blackmun has emphasized, "The victim of the crime, the family of the victim, [and] others who have suffered similarly, ... . have an interest in observing the

inal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act 2005 Reporter 2005 B.Y.ULL. Rev. 835 * Length: 36451 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law for the S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah and United States District Court Judge for the District of Utah. T

hird Wave of Crime Victims' Rights: Standing, Remedy, and Review, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 255 [hereinafter Beloof, The Third Wave of Crime Victims' Rights]; Cassell, supra note 15, at 1381- 82. '7 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, Final Report 114 (1982). 18 Td. 19 Td. at 63. 20 Td. at 72-73. 21 Td.

cate the concerns of the victims and the community in knowing that offenders are being brought to account for their criminal conduct." 2°% As Justice Blackmun has emphasized, "The victim of the crime, the family of the victim, [and] others who have suffered similarly ... have an interest in observing the co