Epstein Secrets

SON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Kom

eissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University o

ct matter of dropping and adding parties." Id at 873 (citation omitted). See also Galustian I. Peter, 591 F.3d 724, 730 (4th Cir. 2010), and Frank'. U.S. West, Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365-66 (10'h Cir. 1993) ("To the extent that Plaintiffs' motion to supplement sought the addition of a party, it is controlled by Ru

derdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 8411

. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 StanPottinger@

v. Peter, 591 F.3d 724, 729-30 (4th Cir. 2010) (collecting cases and noting that Rule 15(a) applies to amendments seeking to add parties); Frank v. U.S. West, Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365 (10th Cir. 1993) (“A motion to add a party 1s governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15a)... .”). Rule 21, “Misjoinder and Non-joinder of P

Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] 2 Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 StanPottinger@

gation has concluded and | am gratified by the Joint Statement issued today by Jeffrey E. Streitfeld on behalf of the parties, in which “Edwards and Cassell acknowledge that it was a mistake to have filed sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz and the sexual misconduct accusations made in all pu

v. Peter, 591 F.3d 724, 729-30 (4th Cir. 2010) (collecting cases and noting that Rule 15(a) applies to amendments seeking to add parties); Frank v. U.S. West, Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365 (10th Cir. 1993) (“A motion to add a party is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)....”). Rule 21, “Misjoinder and Non-joinder of P