Epstein Secrets

win Paul M. Krieger ICRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP 500 Fifth Avenue New York. NY 10110 this Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her on the following: Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Imran H. Ansari AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, P.C. 546 Fifth Avenue 6th Floor New York, NY 10036

ply In Support of Her on the following: Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 841

by The Court notes that, regardless of which motion it considers, the same standard governs the addition of parties under Rule 21 and Rule 15. See Goston v. Potter, No. 08-cv-478 FJS ATB, 2010 WL 4774238, at *5 (N.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Grp., Inc., 248 F.R.D. 4

derdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 8411

. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 StanPottinger@

by ' The Court notes that, regardless of which motion it considers, the same standard governs the addition of parties under Rule 21 and Rule 15. See Goston v. Potter, No. 08-cv-478 FJS ATB, 2010 WL 4774238, at *5 (N.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Grp., Inc., 248 F.R.D. 408

Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] 2 Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 StanPottinger@

gation has concluded and | am gratified by the Joint Statement issued today by Jeffrey E. Streitfeld on behalf of the parties, in which “Edwards and Cassell acknowledge that it was a mistake to have filed sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz and the sexual misconduct accusations made in all pu

by ' The Court notes that, regardless of which motion it considers, the same standard governs the addition of parties under Rule 21 and Rule 15. See Goston v. Potter, No. 08-cv-478 FJS ATB, 2010 WL 4774238, at *5 (N.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Grp., Inc., 248 F.R.D. 408