Epstein Secrets

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights concluded that under the Crime Vict

25 J8RPEPS2 is a model for how victims should be treated in a criminal process, and we really do appreciate it. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. MR. CASSELL: I'll be very brief because I know there are others that want to speak here. I'm Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, previously served as a federal judge at

I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That is

hares Sc_arola;s interest in ftnc;iing oll.t how the agre~ment.came to be.Ill am especially more interested in why Epstein got the deal he got, 11 Frankel said. "W c need to know why he wa~ given ,s4ch an easy sentence. While she has .asked the :House· Oversight Committee to investigate Acosta; Frankel

said she shares Scarola’s interest in finding out how the agreement came to be."I am especially more interested in why Epstein got the deal he got," Frankel said. "We need to know why he was given such an easy sentence. While she has asked the House Oversight Committee to investigate Acosta, Frankel said

rosecutors were able to ignore the controversial nonprosecutibn agreement because it contained some significant fine print; said former federal Judge Patil Cassell, who for years has fought to get the agreement thrown.but. It says only that ho charges could be filed.against Epstein in South Florida, he said. Ber

The complaint does not seek forfeiture of Epstein's house in Palm Beach. While heartened that Epstein howfaces serious Criminal charges in New York, Cassell said he would continue to push a West Palm Beach-based federal judge to throw out the nonprosecutibn agreement that Acosta forged with Epstein's star

eclltor~ were able to ,ignore the controversial nOhprosecutibn agreement because it contained some significant.fine print; sa1d former federal Judge Paul Casseil; who for years Jias-foughtto get the agreement thrown.out. It says. only that no charges could be fikdagainsf Epsteinin South Florida, he said, B,

said she shares Scarola's interest in finding out how the agreement came to be."I am especially more interested in why Epstein got the deal he got," Frankel. Said. "We need to know why he was given such an easy sentence. While she has asked,the House Oversight Committee to investigate Acosta, Frankel said

osecutors were able to ignore the controversial nonprosecution agreement because it contained some significant fine print, said former federal Judge Paul Cassell, who for years has fought to get the agreement thrown out. It says only that no charges could be filed against Epstein in South Florida, he said.

e complaint does not seek forfeiture of Epstein's house in Palm Beach. While heartened that Epstein now faces serious criminal charges in New York, Cassell said he would continue to push a West Palm Beach-based federal judge to throw out the nonprosecution agreement that Acosta forged with Epstein's st

id she shares Scarola's interest in finding out how the agreement came to be. "I am especially more interested in why Epstein got the deal he got," Frankel said. "We need to know why he was given such an easy sentence. While she has asked the House Oversight Committee to investigate Acosta, Frankel said

:44 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWI

howitz has repeatedly referred to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015621 --- PAGE BREAK --- Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 2 of 20 these documents, not only in defamatory statements broadc

, and steal. These are unethical lawyers. This is Professor Cassell who shouldn’t be allowed near a student. This is

derdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 8411

. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem, NY 10590 StanPottinger@

e guided me over to Andrew and | think he recognised me, though | don’t know if he remembered my name. ‘Tm dating a separated married man.’ Bethenny Frankel reveals she want to high schoo! with wife of new boyfriend Dennis Shields Skinny Girl founder Get in there! Prince Harry and Zara Tindall can't cont

pathtojustice.com [email protected] Christine N. Walz HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 31 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] Andrew G. Celli David Lebowitz Emery Celli Brinkerhoff & Abady LLP 600

York, NY 10019 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 841

ir.€1.g- 61743g-cncrnenbegrheRFiliW4(lielf3@t§h.V26a parties, including the Government, to the products of discovery. This was the essence of Judge Frankel's decision in GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 415 F.Supp. 129 (S.D.N.Y.1976), with which I fully concur.") (footnote omitted). Martindeli was cited