Epstein Secrets

une, 2009. Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre AC14 I OCfl And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Ll 19 EFTA00234889 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 20 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MA

red on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 28 of 41 I swear the foregoing to be truthful under the penalty of perjury. FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. aul G. Cassell EFTA00234898 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 29 of 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRI

financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. 3. Accord

zed long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.'" Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action

id [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsbe rg@pod h u rst.com Adam D. Horowitz ahorowit

financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ,r 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. 3. Accor

ed long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action

ecember 30, 2014 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwardk Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS FISTOS & LE RMA , P.L. And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hoc Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the 12 EFTA00188712 EFTA00188713 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30

attacked her in the media as a "serial perjurer." He also repeatedly named and attacked her attorneys — i.e., undersigned legal counsel Edwards and Cassell — branding them, among other disparaging names. "two sleazy. unprofessional. disbarable lawyers." Dershowitz repeated his attacks on numerous world

d be asked about Derhowitz's involvement took the Fifth." This "[sJilence is . . . evidence of the most persuasive character." United States ex rd. Bilokumsky 'Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). quoted in Baxter 1 Palmigiano, 425 U.S 308, 319 (1976). And that silence takes on an even more si

hrman PL Fort uder ale FL 3301 Phone: Fax: G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac V t Lake Ci , UT 84112 Fax o-co

he most persuasive character."' Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "evidence of the most

greed to. represent these girls, along with attorney Jay Howell (an attomey in Jacksonville, Florida with Jay Howell & Associates) and Professor Paul Cassell (a law professor at the University of Utah College Of Law). I filed state court actions on behalf of L.M. and E.W. and a federal court action on beha

0, along with other attorneys at Farmer Jaffe and Professor Cassell, I reached favorable settlement terms for my thre

ity and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 19 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013388 --- PAGE BREAK --- 841, 842 (Fla. 4"" Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have “evidence of the mo