Epstein Secrets

hat. 10 So there were probably about seven or IL eight or nine of u➢ there. Somebody -- maybe Stuart 12 13 IS Rosenfeldt -- had already hired Kendall Coffey, who was -- Kendall la a Miami attorney. Kendall and I practiced together at Greenberg Traurig in the '70a. Kendall became the united States attor

firm hired co represent it in this 21 Rothstein problem and who had filed a lawsuit for 22 the firm against Rothstein immediately -- Kendall 23 Coffey was the attorney -- I stayed on for a couple 24 more day➢, probably a week, 10 days, something like 2S that, and then I left. i effect. He ste

e. So I know him from 2997 until - wo - 14 aro at 2008. I knew him that entire time. In fact, when I went on the bench in 2003, 18 I referred to Stuart my employment case➢ that I had. It I had a great deal of respect for Stuart. 20 Stuart was a very prominent attorney in 21 the employment law a

; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03575-03588 10/19/2009 Kendall Coffey Bradley Edwards Providing New Witnesses W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of ad

n Epstein Hearing Joint-privilege 01340-01341 07/30/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein Depositions Joint-privilege 01331 06/30/2009 Stuart Bradley J. Edwards Epstein depositions Joint-privilege 19 EFTA00602853 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fist

e who came in as a partner and who came in as an associate? A. Depended upon their level of expertise, practice, book of business. It was a decision Stuart and } made together on a case-by-case basis. Q. So you and Stu where the -- were in charge of hiring? A. Stuart and | tried to consult on every hir

f the office can purchase this book? A. | don't recall that. Q. Do you recal) mstructing any of the attorneys in your office to get an opinion from Kendall Coffey whether or not they can legally and legitimately purchase this book? A. J don't recall that one way or the other. [The Complaint referred to was ma