Epstein Secrets

hat. 10 So there were probably about seven or IL eight or nine of u➢ there. Somebody -- maybe Stuart 12 13 IS Rosenfeldt -- had already hired Kendall Coffey, who was -- Kendall la a Miami attorney. Kendall and I practiced together at Greenberg Traurig in the '70a. Kendall became the united States attor

firm hired co represent it in this 21 Rothstein problem and who had filed a lawsuit for 22 the firm against Rothstein immediately -- Kendall 23 Coffey was the attorney -- I stayed on for a couple 24 more day➢, probably a week, 10 days, something like 2S that, and then I left. i effect. He ste

law firm that 20 was representing Mr. Epstein while you were involved? 21 A well, lack Goldberger and the Luttier firm, I 22 believe. 33 0 Bob Critton. 24 A Critton. 23 0 Dld you know Bob Critton? Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00798358 89 91 A Causally. 2 0 What

; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03575-03588 10/19/2009 Kendall Coffey Bradley Edwards Providing New Witnesses W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of ad

edes C. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 0

; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03575-03588 10/19/2009 Kendall Coffey Bradley Edwards Providing New Witnesses W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of ad

ble evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect