Epstein Secrets

ositions of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned

ons of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned

ane Does 2-8, attempt to use the Affidavit of Dr. Kliman for every motion for protective order/objection

. Alfredo Rodriquez (video) 16. Dave Rogers (video) 12 EFTA00792767 17. (live) 18. Michael Austrich (video) 19. Sky Roberts (video) 20. Juan Alessi (video) 21. Lynn Miller (video) 22. Ross Gow (video) 23. Brittany Henderson (live or depo) 24. Any party to this action 25. Any and all wit

rich (video) 19. Sky Roberts (video) 20. Juan Alessi (video) 21. Lynn Miller (video) 22. Ross Gow

ny Records custodians necessary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores

. Alfredo Rodriquez (video) 16. Dave Rogers (video) 12 EFTA00617407 17. (live) 18. Michael Austrich (video) 19. Sky Roberts (video) 20. Juan Alessi (video) 21. Lynn Miller (video) 22. Ross Gow (video) 23. Brittany Henderson (live or depo) 24. Any party to this action 25. Any and all wit

rich (video) 19. Sky Roberts (video) 20. Juan Alessi (video) 21. Lynn Miller (video) 22. Ross Gow

ny Records custodians necessary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores

than any other evidence that the proponent can obtain through reasonable efforts" is at best disingenuous. Plaintiff has designated the testimony of Juan Alessi, Mr. Rodriguez's predecessor who held that position during the timeframe in which Plaintiff claims to have been held as a "sex slave" by Mr. Epstei

s. Plaintiff has designated the testimony of Juan Alessi, Mr. Rodriguez's predecessor who held that posit

w information Plaintiff may present in her case-in-chief. Ms. Maxwell has filed well-founded motions in limine to exclude the testimony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report

they coordinate their efforts in joint conference calls at least two times per month. At recent depositions of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned the witnesses for approximately six to eight hours, often repeating the same or similar questions t

ons of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned

me 50 plus visits to the Defendant's home prior to the time that she hired an attorney. Even in her interview with attorney's handpicked expert, Dr. Kliman, by her own comments, her significant emotional trauma relates to physical and verbal abuse by a prior boyfriend, Preston Vineyard, and deaths asso

they coordinate their efforts in joint conference calls at least two times per month. At recent depositions of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned the witnesses for approximately six to eight hours, often repeating the same or similar questions t

ons of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned

n can that circumstance be addressed by a motion such as the instant one.) 11. Next, Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-8, attempt to use the Affidavit of Dr. Kliman for every motion for protective order/objection filed to date. This also includes the two most recent motions, which attempt to prevent Defendant's

ons of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned

they coordinate their efforts in joint conference calls at least two times per month. At recent depositions of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned the witnesses for approximately six to eight hours, often repeating the same or similar questions t

n can that circumstance be addressed by a motion such as the instant one.) 11. Next, Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-8, attempt to use the Affidavit of Dr. Kliman for every motion for protective order/objection filed to date. This also includes the two most recent motions, which attempt to prevent Defendant's