Epstein Secrets

ved by the Palm Beach Police Department, on some days Epstein engaged in sex with multiple girls.'-' In 2009, one of Epstein's household employees, Juan Alessi, was deposed about 11w parade of young "massage therapists" entering Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. He started working for Epstein in about January

essi Depo. at 46:21- 47:4, 48:18-25, Jane Doe No. 11 Epstein, No. 9:08-ev-80119-cv-KAM (S.D. Fla. Sept. 8, 2009) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 18). Alessi also saw many celebrities came to the Florida mansion, including not only Prince Andrew and his wife Sarah but also "a very famous lawyer that I'm s

e declined to allow a mere "reputational" interest to justify mandatory intervention. For example, Calloway" Westinghouse Eke. Cop., 115 F.R.D. 73 (M.D. Ga. 1987), denied a motion to intervene where the alleged interest was a doctor's "own reputation and academic credibility." Id. at 74. The court denied inte

ieved by the Palm Beach Police Department, on some days Epstein engaged in sex with multiple girls.22 In 2009, one of Epstein's household employees, Juan Alessi, was deposed about the parade of young "massage therapists" entering Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. He started working for Epstein in about January

ssi Depo. at 46:21- 47;4, 48:18-25, Jane Doe No. 21 Epstein, No. 9:08-cv-801 19-cv-KAM (S.D. Fla. Sept. 8, 2009) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 18). Alessi also saw many celebrities came to the Florida mansion, including not only Prince Andrew and his wife Sarah but also "a very famous lawyer that I'm s

declined to allow a mere "reputational" interest to justify mandatory intervention. For example, Calloway'. Westinghouse Elea Corp., 115 F.R.D. 73 (M.D. Ga. 1987). denied a motion to intervene where the alleged interest was a doctor's "own reputation and academic credibility." Id. at 74. The court denied inte

rties in describing what is claimed to be the law to Court. For example, the Response quotes Calloway v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 115 F.R.D. 73, 74 (M.D. Ga. 1987) for the proposition that “a witness’ interest in his reputation alone . . . does not constitute the required ‘interest relating to the property or t

ded. Prof. Dershowitz never stepped into these private quarters. Jane Doe #3 also relies upon the September 8, 2009 deposition testimony of Mr. Juan Alessi to “corroborate” Jane Doe #3’s sensational and false allegations regarding Prof. Dershowitz. However, a more complete examination of that testimony r