Epstein Secrets

5 MR. EDWARDS: Well, you're Just telling her a 6 comment and arguing with her. Ask a question. 7 MR. CRITTON: Want me to read back Arod and 8 Alessie's (phonetic) deposition? 9 MR. EDWARDS: Sure. Into this record? 10 MR. CRITTON: Na 13. MR. EDWARDS: Yes, please. 12 MR. CRITTON: You 'mow you

have to be the Jane Doe; Jane Doe? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Are you aware of any individuals that Miss - 7 Mr. Edwards represents, other than you, a and E.W.? 8 A. No. 9 Q. All right. Then it goes down — again, 1 10 take you back where it says: "Jane Doe was identified 11. via the FBI's investigati

25 Federal, local, that you had been to Mr. Er:stain's home; Page 136 Q. Okay. would be -- 2 A. Yes. 3 Q. — you would assume. C.W. would be E.W., and 4 you would have to be the Jane Doe; Jane Doe? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Are you aware of any individuals that Miss - 7 Mr. Edwards represents, oth

ved by the Palm Beach Police Department, on some days Epstein engaged in sex with multiple girls.'-' In 2009, one of Epstein's household employees, Juan Alessi, was deposed about 11w parade of young "massage therapists" entering Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. He started working for Epstein in about January

essi Depo. at 46:21- 47:4, 48:18-25, Jane Doe No. 11 Epstein, No. 9:08-ev-80119-cv-KAM (S.D. Fla. Sept. 8, 2009) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 18). Alessi also saw many celebrities came to the Florida mansion, including not only Prince Andrew and his wife Sarah but also "a very famous lawyer that I'm s

z] who you know to have stayed at Jeffery Epstein's house on many occasions, correct? And also somebody who you know to have been at the house when E.W. was in Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom getting sexually abused, correct? 26 Of course, in a proceeding such as this one, the victims are entitled to an i

they coordinate their efforts in joint conference calls at least two times per month. At recent depositions of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned the witnesses for approximately six to eight hours, often repeating the same or similar questions t

ons of two witnesses, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi, five different plaintiffs' attorneys questioned

s: 1. EW is filed a motion to vacate the agreed order sealing records and to unseal the nonprosecutuion agreement and addendum in this file. Also, E.W. opposed defendant's motion to unseal said records. E.W.'s motion was granted and defendant's was denied at hearing on June 26, 2009. 2. E.W. is en

09/04/2009 Attorneys at MA Mike Fisten Epstein Juan Alessi Work product; attorney/client privilege; irr

/2009 Attorneys at MA Mike Fisten Epstein Juan Alessi Work product; attorney/client privilege; irr

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07025-07027 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell ■. and E.W. v. Epstein — Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

mething that she communicated to you in confidence with respect to getting legal advice, then that would be privileged. THE WITNESS: Right. Okay. So Juan Alessi's deposition, Alfredo Rodriguez's deposition, and then considerable circumstantial evidence which we don't have to rehash here involving the close per

age -- A. Okay. Q. -- the statement: "Jane Doe number 3 came to the house when Dershowitz was there." And then it's "Id." which is a citation to the Alessi deposition, page 73, line 18 to 20. Do you see that? A. Ido. Q. So that sentence if I -- do you agree with me that sentence is representing to the

. yesterday. That was the Jane Doe case in Federal Court in front of Judge Marra. There were two state claims. I'll -- I'll identify the clients as E.W. and L.M. Q. And then the fourth one? A. The fourth one, I believe -- the initial M. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 261 and I believe