Epstein Secrets

to be "well-founded." For example, Jane Doe No. 3 has made statements to the media about meeting former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean. [ADD SENTENCE ON THIS:4a'so goes to what Cassell and Edwards knew or should have known when they file

bout meeting former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean. [AD

e defenses without questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about her false and outrageous allegations against him. For this reason, Jane Doe No. 3's reliance on Peisach v. Antzma, 539 So. 2d 544, 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), is misplaced. In Peisach, the Third District held that an ex-husband in a post-divorce custody d

bout meeting former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean. De

to be "well-founded." For example, Jane Doe No. 3 has made statements to the media about meeting former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean. Dershowitz is entitled to explore the veracity of Jane Doe No. 3's accounts of these meetings, becaus

e defenses without questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about her false and outrageous allegations against him. For this reason, Jane Doe No. 3's reliance on Peisach v. Amino, 539 So. 2d 544, 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), is misplaced. In Peisach, the Third District held that an ex-husband in a post-divorce custody di

broad subpoena to non- party, Jane Doe No. 3, goes so far as to seek documents relating to former President, Bill Clinton and former Vice President, Al Gore, which, even if such documents existed, would be absolutely irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action. See Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30

ident, Bill Clinton and former Vice President, Al Gore, which, even if such documents existed, would be

inor child and a victim of sexual trafficking. There is no reason this non-party should be forced to produce her diary from when she was a child. See Peisach v. Antuna, 539 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989) (court of appeal holding that trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by granting d