Epstein Secrets

r her,” said McCawley, an associate of noted Bush-Gore recount lawyer David Boies, who has also pursued

ever met her, don’t know who she is, never heard of her.” Similarly, Dershowitz said that Roberts claimed that notable figures such as Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore were present on an https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dershowitz-goes-off-on-woman-who-made-underage-... 4/3/2019 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT

ons but he also said that the client strongly believed what she was saying. At Mr. Dershowitz’s request I attended a meeting on July 6, 2015, at the Boies Schiller Flexner offices in New York City with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley with Mr. Dershowitz participating by Skype. The purpose of the meeting as state

public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerful country in the world. There were two attorneys who

ld. There were two attorneys who argued that case in front of the United States Supreme Court and arguing for the Democratic Presidential Candidate, Al Gore, was David Boies. He had put his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush versus Gore case, and without going into any confidential communications

ys did you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing Virginia Roberts at that time. Q. Anyone else? A. The -- at that time, on December 30th, I don't know that it's dire

broad subpoena to non- party, Jane Doe No. 3, goes so far as to seek documents relating to former President, Bill Clinton and former Vice President, Al Gore, which, even if such documents existed, would be absolutely irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action. See Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30

ident, Bill Clinton and former Vice President, Al Gore, which, even if such documents existed, would be

e referenced case. His rulings are as follows: Non Party's motion to quash, or for protective order, regarding subpoena served on non party law firm Boies Schiller: | The subpoena, as to the law firm, is quashed As to the "Jane Doe #3" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9, 17, 18, 20 and 23. The mo