Epstein Secrets

first offender . . . [because] repeated misconduct is more reprehensible than an individual instance of malfeasance." BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (supporting citations omitted). In addition, juries can consider other similar acts evidence as part of the deterrence ca

irls admissible. Juries considering punitive damages issues are plainly entitled to consider "the existence and frequency of similar past conduct." TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 17 EFTA00725985 443, 462 n.28 (1993). This is because the Supreme Court recognizes "that a recidivist may b

ce of malfeasance." BMW of North America, Inc. I. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (supporting citations

ilar to Jane Doe. Juries considering punitive damages issues are plainly entitled to consider "the existence and frequency of similar past conduct." TXO Production Corp. I. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443, 462 n.28 (1993). This is because Supreme Court holdings recognize "that a recidivist may be punished mor

girls admissible. Juries considering punitive damages issues are plainly entitled to consider “the existence and frequency of similar past conduct.” TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443, 462 0.28 (1993). This is because the Supreme Court recognizes “that a recidivist may be punished more seve

first offender . . . [because] repeated misconduct is more reprehensible than an individual instance of malfeasance.” BMW of North America, Inc. Vv. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (supporting citations omitted). In addition, juries can consider other similar acts evidence as part of the deterrence calc