Epstein Secrets

fana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 5:02 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Ili Dexter — We sent out two sets of victim notifications to

to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I have yet to receive in the U.S. Mail. However, which version of 18 U.S.C. 2255 applies ($50,000 vs. $150,000) seems to be a question of retroactivity of the amendment. This is a civil r

fana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 4:48 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Hi Dexter — I am following up on my e-mail from Saturday nigh

to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I have yet to SOD EFTA00190723 receive in the U.S. Mail. However, which version of 18 U.S.C. 2255 applies ($50,000 vs. $150,000) seems to be a question of retroactivity of the amendment. This is a civil

561 820-8777 From: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 1:29 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Marie, Attached please find a draft response letter to Brad Edwar

to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I have yet to receive in the U.S. Mail. However, which version of 18 U.S.C. 2255 applies ($50,000 vs. $150,000) seems to be a question of retroactivity of the amendment. This is a civil