Epstein Secrets

51630, at *2 n.2 (W.D.N.Y. July 24, 2018) (citing Gonzales v. Nat? Westminster Bank PLC, 847 F. Supp. 2d 56

(internal quotation marks omitted); see also Feliciano v. U.S. Bank N.A., No. 13-CV-5555, 2014 WL 2945798, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. June 27, 2014) (same). The Second Circuit has explained that the type of situation -9- EFTA00802463 warranting equitable tolling is one "where a plaintiff could show that it would have be

tates v. Garcia-Gonzalez, 714 F.3d 306 (5th Cir. 2013) 21 United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3rd Cir. 2002) 14, 15, 16, 17 United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 14, 16 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1986) 15 United States v. Korfant, 771 F.2d 660 (2d Cir

k indictment because they arose out of "the same conspiratorial agreement that underlay the charges dismissed in the Eastern District." Id. at 672. The Second Circuit rejected this argument finding that, as a general rule, a plea agreement only binds the prosecutor's office that entered into the agreement, unless

3, 4 & 7). 3 EFTA00725412 privilege protecting journalists' confidential sources but also a privilege that extends to nonconfidential materials. Gonzales v. Nat'l Broad. Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 29, 33 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Gonzales III") .2 In the present case, Mr. Rush's source -- Mr. Epstein -- is not confi

sed the interview relatively thoroughly. (Id. 1 7.) 4. As noted above, the present motion has been argued on the qualified reporter's privilege.1 The Second Circuit recognizes not only a qualified 1 The First Amended Complaint in Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein (Carroll Decl., Apr. 7, 2010, Ex. E) asserts two claim

3, 4 & 7). 3 EFTA00726066 privilege protecting journalists' confidential sources but also a privilege that extends to nonconfidential materials. Gonzales v. Nat'l Broad. Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 29, 33 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Gonzales III") .2 In the present case, Mr. Rush's source -- Mr. Epstein -- is not confi

sed the interview relatively thoroughly. (Id. 1 7.) 4. As noted above, the present motion has been argued on the qualified reporter's privilege.1 The Second Circuit recognizes not only a qualified 1 The First Amended Complaint in Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein (Carroll Decl., Apr. 7, 2010, Ex. E) asserts two claim

Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant SO ORDERED. .. is beneficial to him." Karl Elmer Forest Hills Corp. Gonzalez. IS9 A.D.2d 613. 553 N.Y.S.2d 22. 23 (2d Dept 1990). We hold that Epstein's check does not constitute a written promise to guarantee the remainder

e law governs in landlord- tenant disputes involving the Government. See Powers United States Postal Sett, 671 F.2d 1041,1043-46 (7th Cir.1982).. The Second Circuit in Kerin did not reach the issue of whether federal common law or state law applied because, in that case, feder- al law and state law led to the s

go through the formality of appearing to testify only to refuse to answer questions concerning the information sought. And the Second Circuit, in Gonzalez, talked about the dangers that if parties to a lawsuit were free to subpoena the press at will, it would become standard operating procedure, and

ivilege seeks to prevent the unnecessary enmeshing of the press in litigation that arises from events they cover. And that's exactly what this is. The Second Circuit interprets the qualified privilege very broadly to apply not only to individual bits of information gathered from sources but also to unpublished