9
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
9 / 9
Mentions
ent, 10:00 AM. Join the Americas Program for a conversation on what will be discussed at this year's Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in Milan from 23 June to 3 July 2025. • CSIS: Press Briefing: Previewing President Trump's Trip to the Middle East — Thursday, May 8, 2025. Location: Onlin
ing) (2), and WPBF (ABC-25) (05/07, Parker). Texas Man Convicted of Making Threats to Kill Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk CBS News (05/07, Myers) reported that a North Texas man, David Aaron Bloyed, 60, has been convicted of threatening to lynch and kill Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk
6, 117, 119 United States v. Miller, 911 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2018) 44 United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782 (2d Cir. 1996) 161 United States v. Milan, No. 08-760,2009 WL 2328870 (E.D. Pa. July 28,2009) 218 United States v. Mitchell, 966 F.2d 92 (2d Cir. 1992) 144 United States v. Milo! 165 F
3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) 231, 241, 247 United States v. Muric, No. 10 Cr. 112 (LTS), 2010 WL 2891178 (S.D.N.Y. July 13, 2010) 86 United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1982) 153, 161 United States v. Napolitano, 552 F. Supp. 465 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) 241 United States v. Nejad, No. 18 Cr. 224
2009) (severing a structuring conspiracy and false statements related to that conspiracy from a "separate" corruption conspiracy); United States v. Milan, No. 08-760, 2009 WL 2328870, at *3 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2009) (severing counts charging a fraud scheme from perjury count for an affidavit submitted
is consent). Especially in view of the courts' well-established deference to the Government's choice of investigatory methods, see United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823, 843 (2d Cir. 1982), the burden of establishing outrageous 105 EFTA00077737 investigatory conduct is very heavy, see United States
2009) (severing a structuring conspiracy and false statements related to that conspiracy from a "separate" corruption conspiracy); United States v. Milan, No. 08-760, 2009 WL 2328870, at *3 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2009) (severing counts charging a fraud scheme from perjury count for an affidavit submitted
is consent). Especially in view of the courts' well-established deference to the Government's choice of investigatory methods, see United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823, 843 (2d Cir. 1982), the burden of establishing outrageous 105 EFTA00039552 investigatory conduct is very heavy, see United States
2009) (severing a structuring conspiracy and false statements related to that conspiracy from a "separate" corruption conspiracy); United States v. Milan, No. 08-760, 2009 WL 2328870, at *3 145 EFTA00095237 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2009) (severing counts charging a fraud scheme from perjury count for an
is consent). Especially in view of the courts' well-established deference to the Government's choice of investigatory methods, see United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823, 843 (2d Cir. 1982), the burden of establishing outrageous investigatory conduct is very heavy, see United States v. Schmidt, 105 F.
6, 117, 119 United States v. Miller, 911 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2018) 44 United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782 (2d Cir. 1996) 161 United States v. Milan, No. 08-760, 2009 WL 2328870 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2009) 218 United States v. Mitchell, 966 F.2d 92 (2d Cir. 1992) 144 United States v. Mitlof, 1
3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) 231, 241, 247 United States v. Muric, No. 10 Cr. 112 (LTS), 2010 WL 2891178 (S.D.N.Y. July 13, 2010) 86 United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1982) 153, 161 United States v. Napolitano, 552 F. Supp. 465 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) 241 United States v. Nejad, No. 18 Cr. 224
2009) (severing a structuring conspiracy and false statements related to that conspiracy from a "separate" corruption conspiracy); United States v. Milan, No. 08-760, 2009 WL 2328870, at *3 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2009) (severing counts charging a fraud scheme from perjury count for an affidavit submitted
is consent). Especially in view of the courts' well-established deference to the Government's choice of investigatory methods, see United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823, 843 (2d Cir. 1982), the burden of establishing outrageous 105 EFTA00103130 investigatory conduct is very heavy, see United States
in return for sex. frequently !III' raveled with Epstein. invite was 1 she met Jeffrey Epstein was Epstein's "unofficial modeled together in Milan and New York. to travel to Epstein's residence in Palm Beach, • orida. She b lieved she first • ' ed Epstein's residence on a Tuesday. Once at th
y provided the following information: On November 2, 2007, private inves ' r Robert Myers and a Hispanic, well dressed fe led s resid Initially Myers was asking for and another name ' iiiim could not recall, before he sai Myers was wor • behalf of attorney's for Jeffrey s e n. Myers asked if
he following information: On November 2, 2007, private investi ator Robert Myers and a Hispanic, well dressed female visited residence. Initially Myers was asking for and another name could not recall, before he said . Myers was working on behalf of attorney's for Jeffrey Epstein. Myers asked if
Page: EFTA02857863_p252 →ed her in New York. Epstein provided a free place to stay in return for sex. frequently traveled with Epstein. invited and modeled together in Milan and New York. to trave to Epstein's residence in Palm Beach, Florida. She believed she first visited Epstein's residence on a Tuesday. Once at the
Page: EFTA02857863_p253 →Entities connected to both Milan and Myers

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
American Express
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Air France
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
Washington State
LOCATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Phoenix
LOCATION
Joe Biden
PERSON
Bella Klein
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Honolulu
LOCATION
Michael Jackson
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
American Airlines
ORGANIZATION