Epstein Secrets

m EFTA00596565 COUNT II (TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWER TO PLAINTIFF ROSENFELDT) 19. Plaintiffs adopt,

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

m EFTA00795664 COUNT H (TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWER TO PLAINTIFF ROSENFELDTI 19. Plaintiffs adopt,

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

EFTA00729480 COUNT II (TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWER TO PLAINTIFF ROSENFELDT) 19. Plaintiffs adopt,

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

EFTA00223344 COUNT II (TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWER TO PLAINTIFF ROSENFELDT) 19. Plaintiffs adopt,

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H