Epstein Secrets

is no constitutional right to bail ending appeal. See, e.g., United States Provenzano, 602 F.Supp. 230, 232 (E.D a.1985); United States a rel. Cameron New York, 383 F.Supp. 182, 183 (E.D. .Y.1974).ms In these cir- cumstances, we hold that § 3143(b), in the Page 6 of 24 Page 6 absence of a showi

alto Shapiro United States, 335 U.S. 1, 19, 68 S.Ct. 6, 1385, 92 L.Ed. 1787 (1948) (following rule of construction of Mike). More recently, in Kastigar, the Court up- held the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. 6002 on the ground that use immunity "is coextensive with the scope of the privi- lege again

certain charges pending in Alabama. Be cause it disputed the very existence of a grant of immunity, the government object- ed to the holding of a Kastigar hearing as unwarranted. Faced with this disputed claim of an un- written grant of immunity, the magistrate did not hold a traditional Kastigar hea

D., Burzynski Research Institute, Incorporated. Cameron Frye. and North American Consul. tains, Limited,

itness' invocation of the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court has held that the scope of the immu- nity granted must be as broad as the privi- lege. Kastigar, 406 U.S. at 460, 92 S.Ct. at 1859. Due to the cumbersome requirements of obtaining properly authorized statutory im- munity, U.S. Attorneys often

cribed the female as a beautiful blonde girl, a "Cameron Diaz" type, 19 years of age, bright blue eyes, a

imony solely as, a victim/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms. , you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with.the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her