Epstein Secrets

used them. F15 See, e.g., United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 393 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004); In re Foster , 188 F.3d 1259, 1269 (10th Cir. 1999). This reasoning applies even when the documents or information are classified as "personal papers" rather tha

contacted his attorney, the dates on which services were rendered, and the dates that the client communicated with his attorney are not privileged. Condon v. Petaque , 90 F.R.D. 53 (N.D. III. 1981). See also Matter of Walsh , 623 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1980) (ledgers, bills, time records, and retainer agre

WITH: (chock ro D Mother 0 Father oth Parents 0 Foster 0 Group Home 0 Other ' (31) CUSTODY STATUS OF

SCHOOL say STUDENT OR STATUS (ORM Ow) 1 E 3 5 6 7 I mieeMent Pan hasesteehave kin 341chtnNt Man Sall40.9m tAEntan 1:51.1A0 ertirsigreel (Condon an =Mb matisnm 0 0•10ninn2 arm) NEW STUDENTS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY ONLY: r ran4 nS Jr WHAT LArMailr S SPOKEN IN RE NOME BY RE PARENT CA GAMOW* C /

s who used them.15 See, e.g., United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 393 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004); In re Foster, 188 F.3d 1259, 1269 (10th Cir. 1999). This reasoning applies even when the documents or information are classified as "personal papers" rather than

contacted his attorney, the dates on which services were rendered, and the dates that the client communicated with his attorney are not privileged. Condon v. Petaque, 90 F.R.D. 53 (N.D. III. 1981). See also Matter of Walsh, 623 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1980) (ledgers, bills, time records, and retainer agreem