Epstein Secrets

under the CVRA, including the Government's obligation to treat the victim with fairness. Doc. #50. The victims also argued that the Government has "Brady" obligations to crime victims not less than criminal defendants that apply regardless of any discovery obligations. Id. This Court has reserved ruli

Telephone Facsimile Florida B E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone Facsimile: E-Mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 7 EFTA00592504 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 185 Entered o

and "respect for the victim's dignity and privacy" have created a substantive due process right. Similarly unavailing is petitioners' reliance upon Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and other criminal law cases finding a due process obligation on the government's part to disclose exculpatory and

4-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: [email protected] Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 9 EFTA00208114

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 17 EFTA00208606 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 226 Entered

s regarding Epstein not wanting underage girls providing him massages would have been required to be disclosed to Epstein's defense attorneys under Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 (1963). If the government ever chose to call her as a prosecution witness, the government would have been obligated to discl

RMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 If

rd (Carolina Academic Press 2014). Law Review Articles Threats and Bullying by Prosecutors, 46 Loyola University Law Review327 (2014) Subverting Brady v. Maryland and Denying a Fair Trial: Studying the Schuelke Report, 64 Mercer Law Review 683 (2013).. Pre-Plea Disclosure of Impeachment Evidence,

iminal Law — CATO Institute, Washington, D.C. (November 15, 1990) Prosecutorial Discretion — Conference on Municipal Law, Brigham Young Law School, Salt Lake City, Utah (March, 1987) The Struggle for Justice - Law Day Keynote Speech, Rockland County Bar Association (May 1, 1992) How Just Are Our Courts? - Th

reasonableness."); / Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432-33, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1565, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995) (under the Due Process Clause and 11 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), prosecutors must disclose all evidence, upon request, that is favorable to the def

cognition of the constitutional principle of separation of powers. Attorneys and Law Firms *1198 Paul Cassell, University of Utah College of Law, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, Bradley James Edwards, EdwardsPottinger, LLC, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, for Petitioner. Richard Christian Komando, Bradley Garrison & Komando, OR

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady' Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would p

42075 E-mail: [email protected] and Li Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe ill and Jane Doe #2 9 L, EFTA00

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 38 of 64 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 CERTIFICATE OF

s representing criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked and t

assell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Voice: Fax: Email: htto://www.law.utah eduThrofilesidefault asp2PersonID—=57Rmamp=taccell,Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic me

s representing criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked and t

assell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Voice: Fax: Email: htto://www.law.utah.edu/orofiles/defaulLaso?Person1O=57&namp=cassell,Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic messag