Epstein Secrets

ls previously produced from the Epstein investigation file. In response to this request, which we understand to be a request pursuant to Rule 16 and Brady for the penalty phase, we have compiled the entire BOP investigative report related to the July 22/23 incident. We will make this document availabl

From: ' To: tonyricco Cc: Bruce Barket BRUCE KOFFSKY Subject: Re: Tartaglione Discovery Requests Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:51:17 +0000 Aida Leisenrin We'll follow up on this request. M

ls previously produced from the Epstein investigation file. In response to this request, which we understand to be a request pursuant to Rule 16 and Brady for the penalty phase, we have compiled the entire BOP investigative report related to the July 22/23 incident. We will make this document availabl

Thank you. Tonyricco Sent from my Vcrizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original messa e ------- From: " Date: 12/10/19 10:22 PM GMT-05:00 To: Bruce Barket , Aida Leisenrin , Tony Ricco , BRUCE KOFFSKY John Diaz Cc: Subject: All, iscovery Requests In response to your recent requests for certain

ssurances of preservation -- requires a full factual record and, if appropriate, sanctions for the loss of the evidence. The Supreme Court held in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963), that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to the accused upon request violates due proces

esent. Accordingly, sworn witness testimony explaining the apparent loss of this evidence is necessary and appropriate. Respectfully submitted; /s/Bruce Barket Bruce Barket reviewing MCC's back up system, and what steps were then taken to locate the video in question? And what were the "technical errors"