Epstein Secrets

of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 20

is inadmissible if it "comment[s] directly, under the guise of expert opinion, on the credibility of trial testimony from" specific fact witnesses. Nimely, 414 F.3d at 398. Additionally, if the expert's "opinion is one that the jury could reach with their own `common knowledge and common sense,' no ex

of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 20

is inadmissible if it "comment[s] directly, under the guise of expert opinion, on the credibility of trial testimony from" specific fact witnesses. Nimely, 414 F.3d at 398. Additionally, if the expert's "opinion is one that the jury could reach with their own `common knowledge and common sense,' no ex

of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 20

is inadmissible if it "comment[s] directly, under the guise of expert opinion, on the credibility of trial testimony from" specific fact witnesses. Nimely, 414 F.3d at 398. Additionally, if the expert's "opinion is one that the jury could reach with their own `common knowledge and common sense,' no ex

259, 263 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (citing Daubers, 509 U.S. at 593-94). But Rule 702 ultimately sets a "liberal" and "permissive" standard of admissibility. Nimely v. City of New York, 414 F.3d 381, 395-96 (2d Cir. 2005). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that confor

of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 20