Epstein Secrets

motion to limit the examination to 6 hours, Defendant’s citation to Lahr v. Fullbright & Jaworski, LLP , 164 F.R.D. 196, 202-204 (N.D. Texas 1995), Morton v. Haskell Co., No. 94-976-Civ-J-20, 1995 WL 819182 (N.D. Fla. September 12, 1995) and Mann v. Newport Tankers Corp., 96 F.R.D. 31 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

ed. In Lahr, the court declined to limit a three hour clinical intake and evaluation by the defendant’s psychologist. Lahr, 164 F.R.D. at 201. In Morton, the court declined to limit a defense psychologist’s evaluation to one hour and declined to limit the evaluation to cover only one specific year,

red on FLSD Docket 08/27/2009 Page 6 of 8 COUNSEL LIST Richard H. Willits, Esquire Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Phone: (561) 582-7600 Fax: (561) 588-8819 [email protected] Robert Critton, Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman Critton

court restrict same in time or scope. Lahr v. Fullbright & Jaworski, LLP., 164 F.R.D 196, 202-204 (N.D. Texas 1995)(refusing to limit examination); Morton v. Haskell Co., No. 94-976-CIV-J-20, 1995 WL 819182, at *3 (N.D.Fla. Sept.12, 1995) (declining to limit duration of examination); See also Affidavi

ity, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 273 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2009 Page 11 of 11 Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hil

re silly, unfounded and alleged violations which are not defined as violations under the NPA but arrived at by the USAO. Thus, EPSTEIN is left with "Morton's Fork" in his side - the undesirable choice of taking the 5h Amendment and having a judgment (summary or otherwise) entered against him in the civ

the following CM/ECF on this 24th day of March , 2009 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.MA. Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barthian & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lake

IED TO DISMISS THE CASE SECONDED BY MS. GREENBERG MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY C. Case # 08-2512, 235 Sunris

rent environmental regime, especially when one considers the public relations downside of fighting him on this issue and spending $2,000,000 to fight Lake Worth on the other side. Mr. Maxey said this was probably not a win-win situation and that NOAA had not even been brought into the fold yet. Mr. Ochstein

IED TO DISMISS THE CASE SECONDED BY MS. GREENBERG MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY C. Case # 08-2512, 235 Sunris

rent environmental regime, especially when one considers the public relations downside of fighting him on this issue and spending $2,000,000 to fight Lake Worth on the other side. Mr. Maxey said this was probably not a win- win situation and that NOAA had not even been brought into the fold yet. Mr. Ochstein